Tests of the GBT performance in the 7mm band (Q-band) were done 22 November 2003. Because the L1 receiver was not working, we used only beam number two, receptors L2 and R2, and did observing in total power mode -- no beam switching. The gain versus elevation was measured by observing several strong calibration sources over a wide range of elevations. The subreflector focus was adjusted before each peak procedure. The observations were done at a frequency of 43.124 GHz with a bandwidth of 0.320 GHz. The frequency of 43.124 was chosen to match the VLBA 7mm band.
A simple model for the atmosphere was fit to the data:
TSYS = Trcvr + Tatm ( 1 - exp( -A*TAU) )
in which A = 1/sin(Elev)
The fitted parameters are as follows:
Parameter | Fit to LCP data | Fit to RCP data |
---|---|---|
Trcvr | 28.4 K | 39.2 K |
Tatm | 203 K | 251 K |
TAU | 0.098 | 0.091 |
Note that Tatm and TAU are highly correlated, so that we can determine the product Tatm*TAU, but either of these terms by itself is not well determined. An analysis by Ron Maddalena suggests the LCP TCals are probably too low and that the slope of Tsys vs A for LCP should be close to that for RCP.
E' = (2k/A) (Tant/S) i.e., the "raw" efficiency uncorrected for
atmospheric absorption.
The efficiency has a maximum at an elevation of about 50 degrees,
then drops and becomes double valued. This can be understood by
referring to Figure 4, which shows the data as a function of scan number,
which really means time, since scan number increases throughout the
observing run.
The elevation is plotted as the open stars using the right-hand scale
on the plot. The left hand scale is used both for the ambient temperature
in Centigrade and the Ap. Eff in percent.
The local time runs from 02:50 AM (scan # 330) to 11:35 AM (scan 802).
The green symbols near near the bottom are the ambient temperature in Centigrade. One may note that the temperature stays fairly constant at about -4C until scan number 600, which corresponds to sunrise. After this, the temperature rises rapidly. As the temperature rises, the efficiency drops.
The numbers that are plotted here are listed in the Table of Data.
Subreflector Y-focus corrections.
The focus corrections that were used for the 3C286 observations are
plotted in Figure 5, as a function of elevation.
The effect of rising temperature in the latter part of the observing
run probably explains the hook in the upper right part of the plot.
t(ONsource) | rms(LCP) mK | rms(RCP) mK | rms(Calc) |
---|---|---|---|
60 s | 162 | 160 | 169 |
120 s | 109 | 115 | 119 |
240 s | 79 | 84 | 84 |
420 s | 68 | 60 | 64 |